Recognising Africans and Asians as
‘inferior’ and undesirable races that are threats to the white, the
so-assumed ‘superior’ race,
the father of the western eugenics movement, Sir Francis Galton, argued that for ‘’a more suitable race to continue to prevail over the less suitable races,’’ the growth of the population of the unsuitable races should always be curtailed.
Alarmed by the
kind of people behind this white supremacy project, Edwin Black in his
famous book ,’War against the weak: Eugenics and America’s campaign to
create a master race,’ wrote, ‘’Eugenics would have been so much of a
bizarre parlor talk, had it not been for extensive financing by
corporate philanthropies [from] the Rockefeller Foundation and the
Carnegie Institution.’’
That explains why Henry Kissinger, a
long-running Rockefeller enabler, produced in 1974 the infamous
‘National Security Study Memorandum 200’ (NSSM200) signed into law by
President Gerald Ford in November 1975 as the official policy document
handed to the State and Justice Departments along with the Pentagon and
the CIA to fiercely pursue population reduction in developing countries,
particularly in Africa.
Just like the earlier eugenics argument,
the crusade to reduce the population of these countries, according to
Kissinger, is to ensure that citizens of these countries never consume
their very natural resources, supposedly meant for Americans and the
preservation of western civilisation.
Since involuntary sterilisation carried
out by both the World Health Organisation and USAID yielded less
expected results, in its ‘Global 2000 Report for the President in 1980,’
the State Department insisted that to drastically reduce the world
population by two billion people by 2000, some deadly and
expensive-to-cure or manage diseases remained the best bet.
The Deputy Director for Research and
Technology, Department of Defence, Dr. D.M. MacArthur, anticipating
excitement from members of a subcommittee of the House Committee on
Appropriation in 1969 about these bio-engineered virus diseases, said
they should ‘’differ in certain important aspects from any known
disease-causing organisms… for it might be refractory to the immunology
and therapeutic process upon which we depend to maintain our relative
freedom from infectious disease.’’
